Not
all data storage systems are created equal
As
next-generation medical devices migrate to smaller form
factors and faster host-system interfaces, the storage
system must follow suit. The positive result of this
trend is the emergence of more reliable medical applications
with more capability than ever before.
These
advances, however, come with a new set of concerns,
such as drive reliability, lifespan, endurance, usability,
and the potentially adverse effects of power disturbances.
As a result, choosing the right type of storage for
a particular medical device is increasingly more complex.
Solid-state
storage has advantages of high reliability and performance,
scalability, security, and endurance. But not all solid-state
storage is created equal. For example, traditional flash-card
technology, originally developed for consumer applications,
appears similar but may not stand the rigors of the
medical industry.
For
instance, its common to see medical devices used in
rest homes, paramedic vehicles, and aircraft. This growing
trend makes it possible for people to play a greater
role in maintaining their own health outside of a hospital
or technicians immediate supervision.
Solid-state
storage has several advantages over traditional storage
devices for these applications. For instance, solid-state
storage has no moving parts, a benefit for rugged or
mobile environments. Medical equipment using solid-state
storage is not susceptible to normal shocks or vibration.
Rotating
hard drives, on the other hand, with moving actuator
arms have a greater chance of malfunctioning when bumped
or moved suddenly. Hard-disk drives have lower temperature
and altitude tolerances as well, factors that come into
play more as medical equipment is deployed in mobile
environments such as airplanes and life-flight helicopters.
Trends
now also call for medical devices to be as small and
portable as possible. Operating rooms in particular,
are requiring that more equipment fit into less space
which translates into physically smaller and lower-power
medical devices. This means designers must find a storage
device that offers performance, consumes little power,
and scales to fit future needs.
Rotating
hard drives are confined largely to 3.5, 2.5, and 1.8-in.
form factors. Solid-state storage, on the other hand,
is more flexible and can be deployed in a number of
smaller industry-standard form factors such as CompactFlash,
USB, or 1.8-inch drives. Because solid-state storage
also consumes little power, it increases performance
and extends battery life. For instance, traditional
small hard drives consume about 2.5 W, while the average
solid-state runs on less than 0.2 W, about 8% of the
hard drive.
The
four big plusses for solidstate drives over others include
tolerances to power irregularities, lifespan, device
diagnostics, and endurance.
Power
irregularities, common even in hospitals, can corrupt
a data-storage subsystem. About two-thirds of field
storage-device failures are due to power disruptions.
Spikes, brownouts, surges, and blackouts are especially
worrisome when it comes to healthcare because they cause
improper operations in medical devices or they cease
functioning altogether. Other storage design considerations
include how power anomalies affect data integrity with
the common practice of devices suddenly switched off
and on, frequent alternation between ac and battery
backup power.
During
under-voltage situations, there may be insufficient
power for the medical device and memory components,
letting the host system send data which corrupts the
drive. Advanced solid-state storage solves that problem
with voltage-detection circuitry that senses power problems.
At a low-voltage threshold, the drive sends a busy signal
to the host system ceasing transmissions until the power
level stabilizes. Then address lines can be latched,
which ensures writing data to a proper location. This
prevents sector overwrites which cause drive corruption.
This is critical for medical devices that run on low
power.
The
lifespan of medical equipment can be many years, often
in less-than-the-best conditions. Whats more, many medical
devices require approval from the FDA, so forced changes
or upgrades may require costly reevaluations or recertifications
that delay their entry to the market.
Internal
diagnostics refers to how well the storage unit detects
anomalies from wear and aging. Advanced solid-state
storage uses Self-Monitoring Analysis and Report ing
Technology (SMART) which lets users monitor the exact
amount of usable storage left in a drive. This monitor
accurately forecasts when a potential failure will occur
and allows time for repairs, thus avoiding unexpected
failures which can lead to critical or life-threatening
situations.
Traditional
flash cards, on the other hand, run until they fail,
often suddenly and without warning. This leads to maintenance
calls, the loss of data, and potentially life threatening
emergencies.
Endurance
of a solid-state drive depends on storage media, wearleveling,
and error correction codes (ECC). Advanced solid-state
storage optimizes all three of these elements. The most
advanced storage media available has maximum endurance
and performance to meet critical medical requirements.
Advanced ECC algorithms should provide exponentially
better error correction than standard versions used
in consumer products. And proprietary wear-leveling
algorithms evenly distribute wear over the entire solid-state
drive.
A
Comparison of widely-used storage devices for medical
equipment
| Market
concern |
Hard
drive |
Flash
card |
Advanced
solid-state |
| Corruption
due to power disturbances |
Adequate |
Susceptible
to power anomalies |
Integrated
voltage circuitry protects against power anomalies
|
| Product
lifecycle |
Less
than one year |
Less
than one year |
Multi-year |
| Wear-out |
Environmental
and mechanical concerns |
Write/erase
endurance <10k cycles |
Write/erase
endurance exceeds 2M cycles |
| Ability
to forecast useable life |
SMART
available, but has limited warning capability |
None |
SMART |
| Frequent
costly product requalifications |
Yes |
Yes |
No.
Qualifications not forced by product obsolenscence |
| Security
options |
Basic
password encryption |
Possible
password |
Multiple
user selectable security options |
| Power
consumption |
2.5W |
0.2W |
0.2W |
| Mechanical
dimensions (in.) |
2.5,
1.8, 0.8 |
2.5,
1.8, CF, SD, Micro SD |
2.5,
1.8, CF, PC, 40-pin |
Designers
should evaluate storage devices based on their ability
to handle power anomalies, provide ample endurance to
perform in products with multi-year lifecycles, accurately
forecast usable storage life, offer enhanced security,
and provide highly reliable storage management technology.